When I first plugged in the names Shirly Ribak, Shiri Arnon
(my roommate), and Leigh Rybak (my cousin) into the first of three different
genre generator websites the result was interesting. I ended up with a piece of
writing that I would assume to be a research paper. I would assume that the
paper generated by the SCIgen is a research paper due to its rhetorical
features and its conventions. First, the audience of this paper is clearly
someone who is interested in the science of the Web and the way in which
algorithms are used to develop various aspects of the Internet. I am able to
infer that this is the probable audience of this piece of writing because while
reading the paper I noticed that the reader is asked to “suppose,” “consider,”
and “see” various things depicted by the studies that are being discussed. Second,
the style and tone of this writing is very formal, clear, concise, and
educational. The word choice is scientific, ranging from scientific nouns to
titles and names of scientific articles, authors, and discoveries. Next, the
purpose of this piece of writing is demonstrated by its abstract, which works
to give a heads up to the reader of what he/ she will be reading about before
he/ she begins to read. Finally, this piece of writing obtains many conventions
that are common to research papers. These conventions include an informative
title, graphs, organizers, diagrams, an abstract, a conclusion, references, and
examples.
Next, I
believe to have generated a comic strip from pandyland.net. Again, I am
convinced that I have generated a comic strip due to the specific conventions
that are apparent in the images that were generated. Some of the conventions
that convinced me that the genre generated from this website is a comic include
the specific font used, speech bubbles, illustrations, color, humor, curse
words, the use of blocks to separate the various images, and the way in which the
images are placed in a sort of chronological order from left to right in order
to depict the order in which the dialogue of the cartoon characters is supposed
to be read. Also, the audience of the comics generated by this website is
probably composed of surfers of the web looking for entertainment while the
purpose of the comics generated by this website is to entertain the very
Internet surfers who are looking to be entertained. Thus, I am convinced that
the genre generated by pandyland.net is a comic strip.
Lastly, I surfed
memegenerator.net and unsurprisingly the genre that was generated on this
website was a meme. One of my favorite memes on this website has coined the
title, “Bad Luck Brian” Meme. This meme
is especially humorous due to its rhetorical features. The audience of the Bad
Luck Brian” memes tends to be composed of surfers of the web who are looking to
be entertained. Likewise, the purpose of the “Bad Luck Brian” memes is to make
surfers of the web laugh either in their head or out loud. A “Bad Luck Brian”
meme has certain conventions that separate it from other pieces of writing and
essentially, other memes as well. The conventions of the Bad Luck Brian include,
of course, Bad Luck Brian, who is a white adolescent male with red hair and
braces wearing a plaid red sweater vest on top of a light blue collared shirt. Besides
Bad Luck Brian himself, the conventions of the “Bad Luck Brian” memes include a
specific font of white block letters that usually spell out funny situations.
For example, one of the “Bad Luck Brian” memes had “Checks under bed for
monster, find one” written on it and another had “wins golden ticket to Wonka’s
chocolate factory, gets diabetes” written on it. Thus, through what is written
in the white block letters and the fact that they are written on top of a
picture of “Bad Luck Brian” allow the reader to infer the genre of the image as
a meme.

Shirly,
ReplyDeleteYour bio:
I agree that Santa Monica is pretty epic. I also think that your participation in the Model UN sounds awesome. I’d love to hear more about that’s like.
PB1A:
Wow, you put a tremendous amount of effort into this. Excellent work here. I especially like how you got specific and tied lyrical convention to Drake’s song. (Specificity is key when we analyze writing.)
PB1B:
Thanks for posting the picture—that’s one of my favorite so far; it definitely made me laugh. In Writing 2, we’re trying to train you to become super-observant so that you can get down to the nittiest of details and adhere (if that’s what you want to do) to the audience’s expectations. Based on your PBs here, you’ve got it down pretty firmly so far, Shirly.
Check plus.